swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2 participants
2918 discussions

[sorbs.net] DUHL listings at SORBS since Sat Oct 22 10:56:46 2005 GMT
by Fabian Uebersax 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

FYI ---------------- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:34:46 +1000 (EST) From: "SORBS Support (Matthew Sullivan)" <duhl(a)sorbs.net> This message is being sent to muliple tickets at the same time so my apologies for not personalising it. All, On Sat Oct 22 10:56:46 2005 GMT the SORBS DUHL list was updated by a script that was manually triggered. The script contained an error which caused most hosts in the networks listed below to get listed as Dynamic networks. The only networks to escape listing were those with the words static, perm, or fix in their PTR records, and only those where the contents of the netblock were predominantly PTR records with those words. As of approximately 10:30am GMT today I performed a mass update on the DUHL database, delisting some 9000 entries, most are incorrrect listings, and some will be updated listings where valid removals have been performed. For this reason I am closing all these tickets as resolved, and requesting that you recheck the database before either re-opening the tickets or logging a new one. Please do not respond to this ticket unless the DB lookup ( http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/db ) shows you are still listed. Please do not respond to this ticket, or create a new ticket if you are receiving blocked messages where the DB lookup page ( http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/db ) shows you are not listed, the blocks have been removed and will take a little while to update. I have mailed all the people subscribed to the SORBS mailing lists asking them to perform a re-sync or cache flush to speed up the delisting process, however there are lots who are not subscribers so will not receive the message. My apologies to all. Regards, Matthew Sullivan Netblocks known to be affected: 71.0.x.x 71.1.x.x 71.2.x.x 71.3.x.x 195.182.x.x 151.203.x.x 153.5.x.x 200.117.x.x 203.158.x.x 210.244.x.x 212.40.x.x 217.24.x.x 222.126.x.x 24.178.x.x 24.231.x.x 71.11.x.x 81.199.x.x 83.174.x.x 85.238.x.x 128.114.x.x 193.27.x.x 206.221.x.x 213.244.x.x 71.12.x.x 83.221.x.x 84.22.x.x 202.161.x.x 207.118.x.x 210.7.x.x 212.110.x.x 213.59.x.x 24.158.x.x 24.176.x.x 24.178.x.x 71.7.x.x 71.8.x.x 83.174.x.x 200.75.x.x 202.161.x.x 202.220.x.x 212.122.x.x 213.158.x.x 213.184.x.x 213.59.x.x 24.240.x.x 68.118.x.x 71.97.x.x 80.85.x.x 82.200.x.x

1 0

WEKO versus Swisscom regarding ADSL: Verfügung online
by Fredy Kuenzler 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

The WEKO paper (Verfügung) is now ready for download: http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/147-WEKO-Verfuegung-in-Sachen-ADSL-… (German) F.

1 0

not very smart, Bluewin
by Fredy Kuenzler 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/146-Der-Bluewin-Liebesbrief-immer-n… F.

1 0

Re: [swinog] not very smart, Bluewin
by marc.fritschi＠sisnet.ch 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

Besten Dank für Ihre Email! Ich bin bis und mit dem 20. November nicht im Büro erreichbar, Ihre Email wird nicht weitergeleitet. SISNET Kontakte: > Kunden Support 7/24: support(a)sisnet.ch > Anfragen an SISNET: info(a)sisnet.ch Für dringende administrative Anfragen kann folgender direkter Kontakt verwendet werden: > Marc Schmid, marc.schmid(a)sisnet.ch Freundliche Grüsse Marc Fritschi, SISNET

1 0

Swisscom Takeover of Cybernet likely to be a antitrust problem
by Fredy Kuenzler 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

André Oppermann in blogg.ch: http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/139-Cybernet-UEbernahme-durch-Swiss… (sorry German only) F.

1 1

Best Way to Sell Network Equipment?
by John Morgan Salomon 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

Hi, a good friend of mine is selling a VoIP switch (unsure what type, new price was about 100k.-) Could someone give me a tip on what the best way or place in Switzerland is to sell this sort of thing without being a hoser and spamming mailing lists? Thanks, -John

1 0

Re: [swinog] THANK YOU!
by Jim Romaguera 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

howdy, mi culpa... from previous swinog the signal was good but shaping made the speed too slow. we said we would raise the shape speed. this event the speed was good (at least quite a few guys told me) but the signal was not so great everywhere in the room (even though we checked it the day before). we took the feedback yesterday onboard about the signal and will install an AP in the room by next meeting. Cheers JIm On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:03:16 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler(a)init7.net> wrote : > Michel Renfer wrote: > >> Except for the lousy WLAN. Down in the big hall it was no problem > >> using it, but up in our room there was almost no signal. Loading up > >> the register website took forever, connections timed out. You would > >> not expect that at a meeting of network experts. Was it too > >> expensive to install a second AP up there? > > > > I already get yesterday feedback from Jim that he would install an > > separate AP in the meeting room for us @ SwiNOG-12 > > I would like to express our gratitude to Jim and all of TheNet for their > continous support of our community, and as already mentioned, TheNet > will improve the WLAN in the meeting room. > > BTW: > http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/134-SwiNOG-11.html > > F. > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > >

2 1

RE: [swinog] THANK YOU!
by Michel Renfer 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

Hi Martin I already get yesterday feedback from Jim that he would install an separate AP in the meeting room for us @ SwiNOG-12 cheers, michel > -----Original Message----- > From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch > [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Martin Ebnoether > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:36 AM > To: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Subject: Re: [swinog] THANK YOU! > > Peter Baumann schrieb: > > I just want to say THANK YOU SwiNOG for the Meeting yesterday. > > > > It was really very informative and fun! > > > > > > THANK YOU also to the Sponsors of the Meeting! > > <AOL>Me too</AOL> > > Except for the lousy WLAN. Down in the big hall it was no problem > using it, but up in our room there was almost no signal. Loading > up the register website took forever, connections timed out. You > would not expect that at a meeting of network experts. Was it too > expensive to install a second AP up there? > > CU, Venty > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog >

3 2

Anyone else who thinks it's uncool?
by Fredy Kuenzler 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/138-Swisscom-nimmt-enter-adsl.ch-oh… F.

1 0

THANK YOU!
by Peter Baumann 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

I just want to say THANK YOU SwiNOG for the Meeting yesterday. It was really very informative and fun! THANK YOU also to the Sponsors of the Meeting! Peter B.

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog