Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an info(a)gpstechnik.ch oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
hi all,
I'm about to start the implementation of ipv6 support in
Torrus (http://torrus.org/), and I'll need some test
devices to play around.
Those willing to help, please open SNMP acess from
2002:3e02:56d7::1 and tell me the access data in private email.
thanks,
stan
Dear SwiNOGers,
Looks like our business goes well, so we need a new engineer in our
team ;-)
You will be involved with the following technologies:
(you do not need to know all of them indeed, we'll be training you on
the missing ones)
- IPv4/v6
- BGP
- MPLS
- Cable (docsis)
- optionaly Linux knowhow
- Multicast
- and more and more, its endless ;-)
We're open to review young people starting in the network engineering
but also senior engineers.
Important point, there is no language restriction, you can be from
German or French speaking part.
Location is Biel/Bienne.
If you're interested, please send your CV to me
pascal.gloor(a)finecom.ch or to Michel Renfer michel.renfer(a)finecom.ch
Regards,
Pascal
Hi all
I have a nice Give-Away for lovers of the good /old Cisco 7000.
It's a Cisco 7000 with an RSP and some Ethernet-AUI ports and Dual-PS.
No more details available
This box was in use for several years; there will be no warranty at all
...
If you want to build a cisco-fridge, it's an ideal starting-point ...
The item has to be picked-up during office-hours by yourself in Berne.
btw: it's a really heavy item
So make shure you have health insurance ;-)
For some beers at the next SwiNOG meeting, the item is yours.
Please contact me off-list
hi everybody
well, it's time to announce the 60th beer event in zurich ,-)
the facts for the next event:
-----------------------------
Date: 7th of April 2008
Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock
Location: @ the "Outback" Bahnhof Stadelhofen
Registration deadline: 04.04.2008 15:00:00
Registration:
-------------
Please register here: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ since we have to make
reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot
attend and you're registered please inform me asap. if you cannot find
us: call me on my mobile: +41 79 277 92 35.
greetings
-steven
Salut, Kurt,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:03:40 +0100, Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
> What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy
> as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems acting
> with some SC subsidiaries...) which high rate valid messages if
> certain brain-dead conditions like PTR not matching MX don't match?
2 points about this.
1. it is highly unlikely that these stupid wannabe SPAM filters get the
response containing so many PTR records right. It is most likely
that either the software blows up or that it only ever considers the
entry it receives first.
(Most likely the software blowing up will not even be remarked but
instead the mail will be rejected silently.)
2. Since a lot of people use personalized domains now in their mail
addresses (me(a)first.lastname.ch, bla(a)pascual.garnier.name,
whatever), the people who use such a setup will be strongly
discouraged very quickly and be forced to drop it, since they want
to still be able to send mail, most likely. We should not make such
stupid moves just to encourage them to adopt such a setup.
> Under the line, it is likely not a DNS issue, but the inability by
> some mail or AS systems resolving lists. Suspect my servers will
> fail, too. Xaver, pls send private reply for a test from that system,
> anytime.
It is also a DNS issue, depending on the number of results returned;
the size of a DNS/UDP response is limited to 1 UDP packet, which again
is limited in size. Not everyone uses DNS over TCP, and it is unlikely
to be adapted just because of such a stupid and useless SPAM filtering
measure.
Tonnerre
Situation is back to normal again, but we saw decreased incoming traffic
here. Anyone else?
Best wishes,
Matthias
_________________________________________
mhs @ internet AG
Zürcherstrasse 204, CH - 9014 St. Gallen
Phone +41 71 274 93 93, Fax +41 71 274 93 94
http://www.mhs.ch
_________________________________________
Our System receive ex. This MSG
The original message was received at Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:20:47 +0100 from
localhost [127.0.0.1]
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to
mxbw.bluewin.ch.:
<<< 451 No thanks. (How about PTR records?) ... while talking to
mxzhh.bluewin.ch.:
>>> QUIT
<<< 451 No thanks. (How about PTR records?) ... while talking to
mxzhb.bluewin.ch.:
>>> QUIT
<<< 451 No thanks. (How about PTR records?) <niesen18(a)bluewin.ch>...
Deferred: 451 No thanks. (How about PTR records?)
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until
message is 5 days old
**********************************************
Xaver Aerni
Zürichstrasse 10a
8340 Hinwil
Tel. 001 707 361 68 39
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
> ...
>> This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return
>> one hostname, not 20.
> ...
>
> Well, tend to agree.
>
> What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy
> as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems acting with
> some SC subsidiaries...) which high rate valid messages if certain
> brain-dead conditions like PTR not matching MX don't match?
Trying to work around them with a dodgy DNS setup is not the right
course of action, IMHO.
> If this approach works out, it could be considered. It is not illegal.
Correct - it's just silly and it doesn't work as expected.
1) a properly working resolver library will return multiple records
rotated once for every lookup, so you're never guaranteed to get the
same answer to a reverse lookup.
2) most applications, e.g. mail-servers, that do reverse lookups do not
expect more than one reply, and will always only process the first one.
> It's just against what we are used to over the last 20+ years.
Plus it doesn't work.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.