Hello
I have written a little documentation about "Schweizer ADSL mit
PPPoA (und MTU 1500)" [1], currently it is only in German, but I
hope it helps anyway.
[1] http://www.wenks.ch/fabian/ADSL-PPPoA.html
It is primarly written for the ZyXEL Prestige 642R modell, but
should work also with similar ZyXEL routers, and can probably be
adaptable for other router products.
Feedback is welcome.
bye
Fabian
As you may know the Swiss Copyright is about the be changed and there
was a public comments phase until end of January 2005. I've written
a position paper for SWINOG and sent it off a month ago.
You can find it here:
http://www.nrg4u.com/abuse/SWINOG%20Stellungnahme%20zu%20E-URG.pdf
it is 10 pages. The text is written in German.
FYI SWINOG is against levies on electronic devices and against too
harsh DMCA stuff.
If you understand German have a look through it. It's very interesting.
--
Andre
Hi all,
I see 9 BGP sessions down at CIXP at the same time (today @ 11h57).
Anybody have info about problems there (public switch, power outage, etc..) ?
Thanks,
Jerome
Hi,
A customer of ours has found his server blacklisted. He tried
everything, mailing to abuse(a)highspeed.ch etc, he called the
hotline. As usual, cablecom is not very responsable.
Has someone a contact adresse (phone etc.) for me so I can
solve this issue ?
Please contact me off-list.
Martin
Martin Blapp, <mb(a)imp.ch> <mbr(a)FreeBSD.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01
PGP: <finger -l mbr(a)freebsd.org>
PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
Can some of you tell, how you deal with mailservers sending mail to your servers, which have not/incorrect configured dns informations?
Postfix rejects mail with "reject_unknown_client", even when a ptr record exist, but forward and reverse lookup are not identical. In our logs we see this misconfiguration happen very often. When I activate blocking these clients, the reject rate nearly doubles.
Just want to know, how you deal with this. Do you reject mail from clients with misconfigured dns or do you tolerate it?
Regards and have a nice weekend.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Tobias Glasow
------------------------------------
Magnet.ch AG
Güterstrasse 86
4053 Basel
Tel.: 0842 420 420
Fax.: 0842 420 422
E-Mail: t.glasow(a)magnet.ch
-----------------------------------
Ihr unabhängiger Internetprovider
-----------------------------------
Hi all,
The recent bluewin migration to new dns load-balancers broke
sendmail on BSD systems. It seems that the BSD resolver (not relevant
if one uses bind8 or bind9) is different than the one in linux.
I suspect that all BSD systems have this problem, including MacOSX.
The following sendmail patch does work around this problem. It is not
100% correct but does work for now.
--- sendmail/daemon.c.orig Thu Mar 17 10:15:11 2005
+++ sendmail/daemon.c Thu Mar 17 10:12:34 2005
@@ -2256,7 +2256,7 @@
/* check for name server timeouts */
# if NETINET6
if (WorkAroundBrokenAAAA && family == AF_INET6 &&
- errno == ETIMEDOUT)
+ (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN))
{
and of course you'll need this option in your MC File:
define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl
Martin
Martin Blapp, <mb(a)imp.ch> <mbr(a)FreeBSD.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01
PGP: <finger -l mbr(a)freebsd.org>
PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E
------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked
> did pay too much as well. =:-)
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load
completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail
in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese
das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
CU, Venty
Sounds like Bablefish ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch
[mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]On Behalf Of Guazzoni Daniele, CH
Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2005 11:17
To: swinog(a)swinog.ch
Subject: RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallab outswisscom dumping)
Maybe I worked until late yesterday, maybe the coffe this mornig was'nt
strong enough...
I tried 5 times to read this mail and I still can't get any logical sentence
out of it.
If someone of you could translate the mail of Xaver maybe...
Daniele
-----Original Message-----
From: Xaver Aerni [mailto:xaerni@pop.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 10:41
To: swinog(a)swinog.ch
Subject: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to
find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay.
Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far...
If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached
image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry
with looking for...:-D)
But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch
[mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebnöther
Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2005 09:16
An: swinog(a)swinog.ch
Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
> -----Original Message-----
> The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked
> did pay too much as well. =:-)
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load
completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail
in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese
das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
CU, Venty
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
If
the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Maybe I worked until late yesterday, maybe the coffe this mornig was'nt strong enough...
I tried 5 times to read this mail and I still can't get any logical sentence out of it.
If someone of you could translate the mail of Xaver maybe...
Daniele
-----Original Message-----
From: Xaver Aerni [mailto:xaerni@pop.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 10:41
To: swinog(a)swinog.ch
Subject: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to
find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay.
Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far...
If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached
image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry
with looking for...:-D)
But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch
[mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebnöther
Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2005 09:16
An: swinog(a)swinog.ch
Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
> -----Original Message-----
> The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked
> did pay too much as well. =:-)
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load
completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail
in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese
das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
CU, Venty
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If
the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
and delete the message and any attachments from your system.