swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2951 discussions

RE: [swinog] sunrise is flooding the world
by Güntensperger, Robert 04 Nov '05

04 Nov '05

Hi Thomas, I've forwarded your mail internal. Cheers, Günti > -----Original Message----- > From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch > [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Thomas Hug > Sent: Freitag, 4. November 2005 09:02 > To: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Subject: [swinog] sunrise is flooding the world > > dear guys from sunrise > > could anyone forward this message to a mailadmin from sunrise? thanks. > > flood problem since yesterday: > > a customer sent a mail with attachement to about 30-40 addresses via > sunrise smtp. all of this 30-40 receipients keep getting this > mail thousand times since yesterday. sender email is info(a)vsmwh.ch. > > sunrise support told the customer that it is his problem and is not > willing to check the situation :) > > the customer has isdn dial in and plugged out his modem ;-) > > i heard that also other guys have the same problem. > > thanks > > -- > kind regards, > > Thomas Hug > Nine Internet Solutions AG, nine.ch > Binzmuehlestrasse 78a, CH-8050 Zuerich > Tel +41 44 481 16 42, Fax +41 44 481 16 43 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog >

1 0

OT: blogging (was: [swinog] WEKO versus Swisscom regarding ADSL: Verfügung online)
by Glogger Steven 26 Oct '05

26 Oct '05

hi fredy it's nice to see that you have started now a successful career in the journalism and politics. s "..thanks for using the blogg2swinog mailgateway for updating my links..." sorry freddy, but don't you think you can write normal e-mails to the mailinglist or do you just keep on pasting links? are you so keen to push your motz-blogg on top of the google ranking? i think, people who wants to read your blogg will do - and people who don't want will not. there was a nice invention some time ago called RSS-feeds. i personally thought at the beginning: well, a nice blogg to cover the interests of the swiss internet community. but now i have to admit, that it seems that this is your personal newsletter to gruble against everyone (aka enemies - i mean 'public' enemies). we all know now that you don't like sunrise, swisscom, cablecom, solnet, etc. to take out a short statistic from the last 20 entries of your blog: - 1 positive message (wimax) - 1 neutral message (swinog #11 - ok, we're all alkies ;-)) - 1 ad (multihomed; it's your right - it's your blog :)) - 15 motz, complain and information about swisscom/sunrise/cablecom/switch/etc. - 2 informations about (possible) bankrupties (comparis.ch/webspace4you) the one really funny entry i remember was the one with the broken /dev/null device. so, please keep in mind that blog's are more or less personal diaries. if you want to really discuss swiss network stuff please use the mailinglist - i will not use your blogg for discussing internet/swinog related topics. so, this is just my personal opinion (and i told you this already some weeks ago whereupon you wrote the /dev/null-thing; this means that my opinion has nothing to do with the fact that cybernet has bought by swisscom). -steven > -----Original Message----- > From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch > [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Fredy Kuenzler > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 12:10 PM > To: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Subject: [swinog] WEKO versus Swisscom regarding ADSL: > Verfügung online > > The WEKO paper (Verfügung) is now ready for download: > http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/147-WEKO-Verfuegung-in > -Sachen-ADSL-gegen-Swisscom-im-Wortlaut.html > (German) > > F. > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > >

6 5

Re: [swinog] [sorbs.net] DUHL listings at SORBS since Sat Oct 22 10:56:46 2005 GMT
by marc.fritschi＠sisnet.ch 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

Besten Dank für Ihre Email! Ich bin bis und mit dem 20. November nicht im Büro erreichbar, Ihre Email wird nicht weitergeleitet. SISNET Kontakte: > Kunden Support 7/24: support(a)sisnet.ch > Anfragen an SISNET: info(a)sisnet.ch Für dringende administrative Anfragen kann folgender direkter Kontakt verwendet werden: > Marc Schmid, marc.schmid(a)sisnet.ch Freundliche Grüsse Marc Fritschi, SISNET

1 0

[sorbs.net] DUHL listings at SORBS since Sat Oct 22 10:56:46 2005 GMT
by Fabian Uebersax 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

FYI ---------------- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:34:46 +1000 (EST) From: "SORBS Support (Matthew Sullivan)" <duhl(a)sorbs.net> This message is being sent to muliple tickets at the same time so my apologies for not personalising it. All, On Sat Oct 22 10:56:46 2005 GMT the SORBS DUHL list was updated by a script that was manually triggered. The script contained an error which caused most hosts in the networks listed below to get listed as Dynamic networks. The only networks to escape listing were those with the words static, perm, or fix in their PTR records, and only those where the contents of the netblock were predominantly PTR records with those words. As of approximately 10:30am GMT today I performed a mass update on the DUHL database, delisting some 9000 entries, most are incorrrect listings, and some will be updated listings where valid removals have been performed. For this reason I am closing all these tickets as resolved, and requesting that you recheck the database before either re-opening the tickets or logging a new one. Please do not respond to this ticket unless the DB lookup ( http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/db ) shows you are still listed. Please do not respond to this ticket, or create a new ticket if you are receiving blocked messages where the DB lookup page ( http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/db ) shows you are not listed, the blocks have been removed and will take a little while to update. I have mailed all the people subscribed to the SORBS mailing lists asking them to perform a re-sync or cache flush to speed up the delisting process, however there are lots who are not subscribers so will not receive the message. My apologies to all. Regards, Matthew Sullivan Netblocks known to be affected: 71.0.x.x 71.1.x.x 71.2.x.x 71.3.x.x 195.182.x.x 151.203.x.x 153.5.x.x 200.117.x.x 203.158.x.x 210.244.x.x 212.40.x.x 217.24.x.x 222.126.x.x 24.178.x.x 24.231.x.x 71.11.x.x 81.199.x.x 83.174.x.x 85.238.x.x 128.114.x.x 193.27.x.x 206.221.x.x 213.244.x.x 71.12.x.x 83.221.x.x 84.22.x.x 202.161.x.x 207.118.x.x 210.7.x.x 212.110.x.x 213.59.x.x 24.158.x.x 24.176.x.x 24.178.x.x 71.7.x.x 71.8.x.x 83.174.x.x 200.75.x.x 202.161.x.x 202.220.x.x 212.122.x.x 213.158.x.x 213.184.x.x 213.59.x.x 24.240.x.x 68.118.x.x 71.97.x.x 80.85.x.x 82.200.x.x

1 0

WEKO versus Swisscom regarding ADSL: Verfügung online
by Fredy Kuenzler 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

The WEKO paper (Verfügung) is now ready for download: http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/147-WEKO-Verfuegung-in-Sachen-ADSL-… (German) F.

1 0

not very smart, Bluewin
by Fredy Kuenzler 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/146-Der-Bluewin-Liebesbrief-immer-n… F.

1 0

Re: [swinog] not very smart, Bluewin
by marc.fritschi＠sisnet.ch 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

1 0

Swisscom Takeover of Cybernet likely to be a antitrust problem
by Fredy Kuenzler 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

André Oppermann in blogg.ch: http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/139-Cybernet-UEbernahme-durch-Swiss… (sorry German only) F.

1 1

Best Way to Sell Network Equipment?
by John Morgan Salomon 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

Hi, a good friend of mine is selling a VoIP switch (unsure what type, new price was about 100k.-) Could someone give me a tip on what the best way or place in Switzerland is to sell this sort of thing without being a hoser and spamming mailing lists? Thanks, -John

1 0

Re: [swinog] THANK YOU!
by Jim Romaguera 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

howdy, mi culpa... from previous swinog the signal was good but shaping made the speed too slow. we said we would raise the shape speed. this event the speed was good (at least quite a few guys told me) but the signal was not so great everywhere in the room (even though we checked it the day before). we took the feedback yesterday onboard about the signal and will install an AP in the room by next meeting. Cheers JIm On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:03:16 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler(a)init7.net> wrote : > Michel Renfer wrote: > >> Except for the lousy WLAN. Down in the big hall it was no problem > >> using it, but up in our room there was almost no signal. Loading up > >> the register website took forever, connections timed out. You would > >> not expect that at a meeting of network experts. Was it too > >> expensive to install a second AP up there? > > > > I already get yesterday feedback from Jim that he would install an > > separate AP in the meeting room for us @ SwiNOG-12 > > I would like to express our gratitude to Jim and all of TheNet for their > continous support of our community, and as already mentioned, TheNet > will improve the WLAN in the meeting room. > > BTW: > http://www.blogg.ch/index.php?/archives/134-SwiNOG-11.html > > F. > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > >

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog