Am 26 Feb 2009 um 10:25 hat Fredy Kuenzler geschrieben:
> Stanislav Sinyagin schrieb:
hardware is not ready, and the times wehre you install PPPoE on a single
client are long time gone. what to do with the famous family webcam, or the
X-Box of the son ?
so only solution is to have a box wich converts V6 to V4
well again there is a solution, buy another PC and use that as a
nat/conversion box. Nat router before 15W new PC 120W
is that the way we go to an green future ?
Or connect straigth all devices to the ISP, thats even a go back to the
oldfirewall/natless times in home envirnonment. that would be a push
forward again for malware. opens new way for some "bundestrojaner" ;)
> > The fact that Andreas or Tonnere is able to configure ipv6 at home
> > does not create a business case.
most XP-PC are having IPV6 allready installed with all his funy virtual
networkdevices. if i ask, allways got the answer, i dont know what that is, i
just activated it because its there.
> If you don't get extra v4 space in 1000 days, don't even consider to
> complain. You have been warned.
what about all the 18 A class net not in use ?
How to deassign large Company b class network which they since years
only use internally ? UBS, CS to only mention the largest ones
think about the mil network as well ... a shame and an waste of IP-Space.
i'm absolutely not against IPV6 but now, to push the enduser to use it with all
his hazzle is the wrong way, We have enough Banana products on the
world, where the users suffering while waiting for upgrade x-y to get it
. users need an all over solution. working and plug and play.
in the IPV6 case the priority is different than in other cases. not the request
of the client will lead to more IPV6 Enabled products, it have to be ready and
implemented to getting users attention.
that we have to accept.
its not a feature . its a must to go for IPV6.
It have nothing to do with marketing .. sorry to dissapoint the marketing guys