Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor(a)spale.com> 2007-06-07:
This is the normal routed case. I think this is what
Not quite, but oh never mind. The point I was trying to make is the
fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be
able to assign *any* address of his /30 subnet to a server behind his
ADSL router because all of the subnet would be consumed by the link from
the LNS to the ADSL router (I guess this hasn't come across too well
from my message).
It seems nobody can imagine how this is supposed to be the case, so I
guess that confirms that it's probably bogus information. Thanks anyway
for all responses!
Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel(a)roe.ch>