RE: [swinog] Re: blocking ports? - swinog

13 Apr 2007

Well only sending would be blocked.. RX could be open ;-)

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Daniele Guazzoni" &lt;daniele.guazzoni(a)gcomm.ch&gt;
Reply-To: swinog(a)swinog.ch, daniele.guazzoni(a)gcomm.ch
Date:  Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:13:18 +0200 (CEST)

...
 Ladu, Daniele wrote:
  Why not sell some fixed IPs, to customers who
want use their own
 mailserver ?
 If i receive a request from such a user, that has a dyn IP, i tell him
 to buy
 a static one, because of full control and exclusion of DUHL. Furthermore
 the customer is self responsable, if a IP Adress in his range will be
 listed.
 Complaint Mails are also directly sent to the owner of the IP, so the
 Abuse Team
 don't need to work on such cases. 
That's the setup I have.
ADSL with static IP, own MTA, registered abuse e-mail, ...
Having a smarthost in front would not be a big problem too but I'll prefer
to be directly exposed to the internet as I'm developing a spam-filter and
the "raw scum" feeds my filter :-)

Daniele

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailGate, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at mgz.ch