Is swisscom mobile going to do something about this?
This address is listed by four different blocklists - abuseat, spamcop, sorbs and uceprotect.
According to spamcop:
"In the past 89.6 days, it has been listed 37 times for a total of 50.0 days."
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
wait a second
there is a guy spamming over gprs - or is this the whole GPRS? (does swisscom do a NAT on mobile connection? sunrise gives only a 10.* subnet)
silvan Am 28.11.2007 um 16:09 schrieb Per Jessen:
Is swisscom mobile going to do something about this?
This address is listed by four different blocklists - abuseat, spamcop, sorbs and uceprotect.
According to spamcop:
"In the past 89.6 days, it has been listed 37 times for a total of 50.0 days."
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
-- http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
this is IMHO a router adress for gprs/umts.
all UMTS users get one of this public ip adresses behind a NAT (simplified illustrated)
i think the blacklisting is normal when so much of peoples using this address
marco
Per Jessen wrote:
Is swisscom mobile going to do something about this?
This address is listed by four different blocklists - abuseat, spamcop, sorbs and uceprotect.
According to spamcop:
"In the past 89.6 days, it has been listed 37 times for a total of 50.0 days."
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2007 16:09 schrieb Per Jessen:
Is swisscom mobile going to do something about this?
No they're not.
We had this problem several times and I did have a few talks with the swisscom techs. According to them they have no possibility to identify a customer sending spam via gprs and are not planing to do soemthing to be able to.
They know perfectly well that masses of spam are being sent via gprs and that their ip is well blacklisted.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
Benoit Panizzon wrote:
They know perfectly well that masses of spam are being sent via gprs and that their ip is well blacklisted.
I was pretty certain that was the case. Thanks.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg