http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Orange seems fine to me
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-Language: de-DE,de;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4 Host: lew.io User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.75 Safari/535.7 x-bearer-type: UMTS x-forwarded-for: 10.157.85.200, 213.55.184.167 x-roaming: NO x-up-bearer-type: UMTS
That explains why I can't use Google Maps on my Laptop anymore..... the mobile version does not work in the desktop chrome
Am 25.01.2012 12:59, schrieb Stanislav Sinyagin:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Sorry for follow up, but funny... their twitter account is swamped as everyone asks them.
Lol, I think they are investigating it... at least thats what the 3 or 4 canned messages repeated over and over say.
There's some pretty heavy penalties for breaching personal data in the UK.. will be interesting to see if the law is put to proper use.
Steve
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Silvan Gebhardt gebhardt@openfactory.chwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Sorry for follow up, but funny... their twitter account is swamped as everyone asks them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8f91sACgkQC82WwYR1u2q7PwCgk4eSZOXmsO5DLvuX9ek/2Ohn pdIAnjTlciMjwT1i0zkkj8+AU5BjkTWM =FbAL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Hi,
I just did a dump of packets reaching a website from Swisscom, and no phone number nor other identification data is inserted.
Guillaume
2012/1/25 Stanislav Sinyagin ssinyagin@yahoo.com
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Someone created this.. altho its just printing the http headers so not rocket science..
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Guillaume Leclanche < guillaume@leclanche.net> wrote:
Hi,
I just did a dump of packets reaching a website from Swisscom, and no phone number nor other identification data is inserted.
Guillaume
2012/1/25 Stanislav Sinyagin ssinyagin@yahoo.com
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
On 25. 01. 12 14:03, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Someone created this.. altho its just printing the http headers so not rocket science..
And you would take this as a definitive answer ?
Look closely on what this page shows and you will see headers your browser did not send (x-forwarded-for even without a proxy) and will miss some your browser did send (connection, cache-control). Why ? Because it's certainly hosted behind some reverse proxy.
At the end of the day, you have no clue about what headers you did really send or not.
Guillaume's point is a good one, get back to what you know.
And on a network oriented mailing list, a dump of packets never looks like rocket science :)
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Rene Luria operator@infomaniak.ch wrote:
On 25. 01. 12 14:03, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Someone created this.. altho its just printing the http headers so not rocket science..
And you would take this as a definitive answer ?
Look closely on what this page shows and you will see headers your browser did not send (x-forwarded-for even without a proxy) and will miss some your browser did send (connection, cache-control). Why ? Because it's certainly hosted behind some reverse proxy.
At the end of the day, you have no clue about what headers you did really send or not.
Guillaume's point is a good one, get back to what you know.
And on a network oriented mailing list, a dump of packets never looks like rocket science :)
I for one do not have a webpage ready to output headers, although it would only take me 1 minute to login to a box and create one. It seems easier to forward something.. no?
Yes, I understand headers and issues with them, but it does show the offending headers if they are present, which was the point (x-forwarded is not of interest)..
Steve
-- Rene Luria
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
as far as i know the design, there is no way that the NAT gateway knows the number. correlation is done later or so. and that would definetly break the rules of data protection / law.
-steven
On 01/25/12 13:55, Guillaume Leclanche wrote:
Hi,
I just did a dump of packets reaching a website from Swisscom, and no phone number nor other identification data is inserted.
Guillaume
2012/1/25 Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@yahoo.com mailto:ssinyagin@yahoo.com>
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857 did anyone test this for Swiss operators? _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch <mailto:swinog@lists.swinog.ch> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
On the Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:59:29AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:
Hi all.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
Since I have an O2 (Germany) prepaid card which I use for mobile Internet access when in Germany:
Are O2 UK and O2 Germany different companies just operating under the same brand?
Anyway, I think I will test tonight, if this happens for O2 Germany too if nobody else does it until then. And I will happily ignore the fact that roaming fees will probably cost me an arm and a leg, maybe even my own!
CU, Venty
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Martin Ebnoether ventilator@semmel.chwrote:
On the Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:59:29AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:
Hi all.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857
did anyone test this for Swiss operators?
Since I have an O2 (Germany) prepaid card which I use for mobile Internet access when in Germany:
Are O2 UK and O2 Germany different companies just operating under the same brand?
The O2 brand is owned by Telefonica...
Steve
Anyway, I think I will test tonight, if this happens for O2 Germany too if nobody else does it until then. And I will happily ignore the fact that roaming fees will probably cost me an arm and a leg, maybe even my own!
CU, Venty
-- ASAP DO $liste_mit_zeugs @once UNTIL yesterday! BUT DO NOT ask_back() IF unclear ELSE END with_coredump = 3GB! LIE "All done."! PROCRASTINATE UNTIL year=year + 1!
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
On 1/25/12 3:12 PM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Martin Ebnoether <ventilator@semmel.ch mailto:ventilator@semmel.ch> wrote:
On the Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:59:29AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered: Hi all. > http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857 > > did anyone test this for Swiss operators? Since I have an O2 (Germany) prepaid card which I use for mobile Internet access when in Germany: Are O2 UK and O2 Germany different companies just operating under the same brand?The O2 brand is owned by Telefonica...
Hi all,
And the article about it here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16725531
seems it was only UK related.....
-- Mihai
-
Guillaume Leclanche -
Martin Ebnoether -
Mihai Tanasescu -
Rene Luria -
Silvan Gebhardt -
Stanislav Sinyagin -
Stephen Wilcox -
Steven Glogger