Peter Keel wrote:
- on the Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I would be interested to know why you find UCEprotect to be unreliable and unprofessional?
Because of their delisting-procedure. How many networks will end up in there which have been sending spam at some time, but don't ever sent spam since then, because their admins fixed the problem, or the net got reassigned or whatever?
UCEprotect level1 and -2 both include automatic delisting. Only level3 does not seem to have automatic delisting.
With UCEprotect, I estimate about 30% of their entries being listed are such false positives, and this will of course raise and raise..
I ran some stats on our traffic (we use UCEprotect 1,2,3) for all of october - false positives per level:
level1 = 0.75% level2 = 2.06% level3 = 0.96% (we have been using level3 experimentally for the last third of october)
false positive = non-spam email sent by levelX listed server.
Per Jessen