Doesnt matter. Switch is only following the rules in the law. Now we can argue if its a good law or not. And we can launch a public voting for this in switzerland (not like in germany)
On 13.08.2012, at 21:47, Oliver Schad oliver.schad@oschad.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:04 +0200 Guillaume Leclanche guillaume@leclanche.net wrote:
I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the block can be done. In addition, I think Switch makes a good job applying this law. I'd be happy that switch blocks one of my domains to prevent me from being sued for damages by some infected people.
If the entities domain owner, server owner and service owner are the same - no problem.
You want that your email communication is blocked because one of your clients has a client that hosts a vulnerable PHP application? Come on.
Regards Oli
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog