Moin,
I suggest to take Xavers statement as it is. no more comments - everybody who tried hard enough got the message.
cheers pap
-----Original Message----- From: swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Guido Roeskens Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 20:44 To: swinog@swinog.ch Subject: Re: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our newnetzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question,
but none has
to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one
comes not far...
If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways
"kopierer@...." That
becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog