Hi Jeroen
this was in the NZZ too. I find the first part of you quotes much worse than the second one.
Dauert der schwerwiegende Rechtsverstoss an, soll der Provider dem Rechtsinhaber die Identität bekannt geben, damit dieser seine zivilrechtlichen Ansprüche geltend machen kann.
In essence it means, that the intellectual property people now have easier access to private data than say law enforcement, circumventing every legal principle I know. Whatever is decided on the legality of certain actions, its courts that should diced if the law was broken, not some legal department of a large company.
Never the less: Schöne Pfingsten
Serge