swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2953 discussions

Next swinog date?
by Reto Burkhalter 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

Hello everyone Anyone knows something about the next Swinog date? Nothing on the website and no announcement?? Regards, Reto

2 1

<BIG FAT WARNING> Watch your Looking Glass
by Pascal Gloor 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

the ones having a looking-glass sending regexp commands to a cisco router should disable it ASAP. Some specific regexp simply crash the router. the regexp is available upon request (I will only answer to people I know) --- lab-router#show ip bgp regexp <xxxxxx> 08:22:00 UTC Thu Sep 13 2007: TLB (load or instruction fetch) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x4292C268 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 4292C268 4292C428 4292C4A8 4292C470 4292C428 4292C4A8 4292C470 4292C428 4292C4A8 4292C470 4292C428 4292C4A8 4292C470 4292C428 4292C4A8 4292C470 $0 : 00000000, AT : 00000050, v0 : 454A0000, v1 : 60B0B650 a0 : D83CD540, a1 : D83CD53C, a2 : 60F96210, a3 : 454A0000 t0 : 00000002, t1 : 00000000, t2 : 00000000, t3 : FFFF00FF t4 : 42770408, t5 : 2C000000, t6 : 7C000000, t7 : 00000000 s0 : 60B0B6BE, s1 : 60B0B6C4, s2 : 454A0000, s3 : 454A0000 s4 : 454A0000, s5 : 454A0000, s6 : 60B0B6C9, s7 : 00000001 t8 : 04000000, t9 : 3C000000, k0 : 540C69C4, k1 : 41288F7C gp : 43C7A338, sp : 4549F850, s8 : 454A0000, ra : 4292C034 EPC : 4292C268, ErrorEPC : 424F295C, SREG : 3400FF03 MDLO : 00000000, MDHI : 00000008, BadVaddr : D83CD540 DATA_START : 0x4370ACD0 Cause 00000008 (Code 0x2): TLB (load or instruction fetch) exception

3 3

Re: [swinog] <BIG FAT WARNING> Watch your Looking Glass
by Scott Weeks 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

--- pascal.gloor(a)spale.com wrote: here's the cisco advisory: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20070912-regexp.shtml ---------------------------------------------- Sounds like the same thing as the late 1990s. "sho ip bgp regexp <stuff>" caused a reboot. scott

1 0

anyone from COLT AS8220 here?
by Fredy Kuenzler 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

Please contact me offlist. I couldn't get hold of anyone at #ix or #swinog, unfortunately. It's a GeoIP issue we would like to resolve and concerns 217.110.0.0/15. Thanks, Fredy

1 0

Customers of Telia AS1299 around ?
by Pascal Gloor 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

Could you check if you see any prefix on this path ? ^1299_15600 Thanks Pascal

2 1

Re: [swinog] Eines der ersten Urteile gegen Spamer ist draussen
by Elvis Altherr 06 Sep '07

06 Sep '07

Hm, this shows clearly that judges don't know the internet mechanicms at the moment *** smile *** they're really confused about it and so the result is often a "Freispruch"... But allow me one question: Why do you have gave up an announcement information for this little and insignificant case? Ok i agree to fight against spammers, but this is only a fight against windmills (it's my personel oppion) regards E.Altherr

3 2

DSL problems today morning
by Xaver Aerni 06 Sep '07

06 Sep '07

Hello, Some of our Costumer says that the DSL Line was down. At 1:15 UTC is the Line going down. The Most Router don't restart automaticly. Did anyone about this problem... Was this a Softwareupdate from Swisscom? Greetings X. Aerni ********************************************** Xaver Aerni Zürichstrasse 10a 8340 Hinwil Tel. 001 707 361 68 39

4 3

Strange BIND 8.3 behaviour
by Benoit Panizzon 05 Sep '07

05 Sep '07

Hi all We observe a strange bind 8.3 behaviour with the domain zhaw.ch According to SWITCH: Name servers: ns1.zhwin.ch [160.85.104.60] ns2.zhwin.ch [160.85.104.61] $ host -t ns zhaw.ch zhaw.ch name server ns1.zhaw.ch. zhaw.ch name server ns2.zhaw.ch. (which have the same IP as the zhwin server above) Well, what happens now, is that right after restarting bind, it does not know the domain. So the first query goes to switch and gets the zhwin DNS Servers. With the IP-Addresses of the zhwin server, bind does resolve hosts within the zhaw domain and learns about the NS published in that zone. After a while, the entries in the zone expire, but strangely bind still nows the names of the zhaw.ch dns but not their IP-Addresse. So bind 8.3 does query switch for the ip addresse of ns1.zhaw.ch and ns2.zhaw.ch. Of course switch does not know. => bind complains that no nameservers are resolvable for that domain. Users cannot get though to the website and mailserver of zhaw. This does not seam to happen with bind 9 DNS. Is this a bug (or feature) in bind 8.3 or is this just a misconfiguration in the zhaw zonefile? I already contacted them and asked them to either change the NS registered @ switch or to put the same DNS as @ switch into the zonefile to fix that problem. Benoit Panizzon -- I m p r o W a r e A G - System Services ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

2 1

Eines der ersten Urteile gegen Spamer ist draussen
by elvis.altherr＠dplanet.ch 04 Sep '07

04 Sep '07

Hi Per Oh really? Sounds good! I think here in Switzerland the laws are not very familiary with the internet rights and therefore a "Freispruch" mangels Beweisen oder Alternativen (who knows) is often the final result. However Spammers are (in my oppion) bad guys which shoud be offended for a long time into jail... and pay the whole life for the damage they did to the internet community :-) So i think the new "Antispam-Gesetz" is one step in the right direction _____________________________________________________________ NEU: Ihre Photos online verwalten, mit anderen teilen und die besten Bilder gleich entwickeln lassen - GRATIS für den 1. Monat (exkl. Entwicklung) www.sunrise.ch/photoalbum

1 0

Eines der ersten Urteile gegen Spamer ist draussen
by Xaver Aerni 04 Sep '07

04 Sep '07

Hallo, Der Kanton Zug hat das erste Urteil gegen das Antispamgesetz verkündet. Dabei stellte es sich auf den gesichtspunkt, dass ein Abmeldelink alleine genügt. Auf die Punkte, das der Kläger weder eine Einwilligung gegeben habe und auch keine Geschäftsbeziehung habe, wurde ignoriert Wer interesse hat kann das Urteil selber unter http://www.pop.ch/urteil.pdf. Ich denke das gibt ein wenig Gesprächsstoff Gruss Xaver ********************************************** Xaver Aerni Zürichstrasse 10a 8340 Hinwil Tel. 001 707 361 68 39

7 10

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog