swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2 participants
2943 discussions

SwiNOG-BE109 - Beer Event 109 - 7th of May 2012 @ Outback Lodge / ZH
by Steven Glogger 03 May '12

03 May '12

hi everybody here's the announcement for the next beer event: the facts for the next event: ----------------------------- Date: 7th of Mai 2012 Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock Location: @ the "Outback" Bahnhof Stadelhofen Registration deadline: 07.05.2012 10:00:00 Registration URL: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ ----------------------------- i've reserved for 10 people, if there are more I need to hurry up to change the reservation :) since we have to make reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot attend and you're registered please inform me asap (+41 79 277 92 35). greetings -steven

1 0

Suche Rack
by Rolf Tschumi 03 May '12

03 May '12

Hallo an alle, suche dringend 19" Racks, Angebote bitte an mich, Offline. Vielen Dank Gruss Rolf

2 1

Rackspace at InterXion
by Frank Garcia 03 May '12

03 May '12

Good morning Swinogers, I am looking for either a 1/4 or 1/2 private rack at InterXion Glattbrugg with a 24/7 badge access to the rack. Power footprint requirements would be quite minimal. If you have anything to offer please get in touch with me offline. Cheers, Frank

1 0

mailing list going berserk, check your logs
by Markus Wild 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

I'm currently seeing on two completely independent mail platforms incoming mails from newsletter4-bounces(a)moneycab.ws, which seem to be out-of-office replies sent back to the mailing list and redistributed again... you get the idea ;) I suggest you check your smtp logs whether you or your customers are also victims of this sender, and act accordingly if you are. from=<newsletter4-bounces(a)moneycab.ws>, relay=ml05.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.71] (I wouldn't assume the relay to be constant though). At least one mailing list currently being part of this problem is: "Swiss Leadership Forum - Newsletter vom 30.04.2012" nice to know Swiss leadership doesn't know how to deal with buggy exchange out of office replies :) Cheers, Markus

1 0

FW: IPv6 de-aggregation
by John.Collins＠BIT.admin.ch 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi again Swinog members, Many thanks for the many informative replies. Some or maybe most (random sample) of the /48s in the routing table are not PIs - needs further analysis. Regarding the PI suggestion, what do we do with customers who will never have an own AS and will never be dual homed? Do they have to "resign" to using Provider space - with renumbering when they change Provider. Or is there another way? I know of this document which seems to tolerate /48 prefix propagation (even if the case described is not exactly our case) http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-532. Does this document mean anything to SPs out there? Thanks again John -----Original Message----- From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Bernhard Schmidt Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2012 10:39 To: swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch Subject: Re: [swinog] IPv6 de-aggregation On 27.04.2012 10:09, John.Collins(a)BIT.admin.ch wrote: Hello, > we're a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and > /48s to customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their > Internet feed from us but from any Service Provider of their choice. The > customers will have to convince their SPs (X, Y, Z) to route these "non > X,Y,Z" or "foreign" prefixes. We're getting a lot of "raised eyebrows" > about this. What's this about prefixes longer that /32 not being > propagated? When I look at the IPv6 table I see: > > IPv6 Routing Table Summary - 8625 entries > > 5 local, 2 connected, 3 static, 0 RIP, 8615 BGP 0 IS-IS, 0 OSPF > > Number of prefixes: > > /0: 1, /8: 1, /10: 1, /12: 1, /16: 1, /19: 2, /20: 5, /21: 3 > > /22: 5, /23: 5, /24: 7, /25: 4, /26: 9, /27: 10, /28: 31, /29: 19 > > /30: 15, /31: 13, /32: 4049, /33: 97, /34: 87, /35: 93, /36: 242, /37: 7 > > /38: 50, /39: 22, /40: 385, /41: 12, /42: 18, /43: 34, /44: 151, /45: 15 > > /46: 75, /47: 45, /48: 3006, /49: 3, /50: 1, /52: 5, /56: 9, /64: 40 > > /126: 1, /128: 45 > > So where did all the /48s come from ... also one or two /40s... ?? Deaggregation and PIv6 prefixes (which are /48s usually). > What do you think about this? If you're a SP would you route the /48s or > /40s from the customers? What about your upstream peers? If you were my paying customer insisting on getting a /40 or /48 from your PA space announced I would of course do so. But that's only half of the story, because others have to accept that. And there will be networks that don't. There is no real consensus on if and how much deaggregation from PA space should be allowed. As long as that is not there, we are filtering >/36 from PA space. And I know others do, too. If you absolutely need to do this, make sure you announce the covering /32 somewhere. And make sure you do everything possible to prove the validity of those routes (proper route6-objects, maybe RPKI ROA, ...) Bernhard _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

3 2

IPv6 de-aggregation
by John.Collins＠BIT.admin.ch 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi SWINOG members, we're a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and /48s to customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their Internet feed from us but from any Service Provider of their choice. The customers will have to convince their SPs (X, Y, Z) to route these "non X,Y,Z" or "foreign" prefixes. We're getting a lot of "raised eyebrows" about this. What's this about prefixes longer that /32 not being propagated? When I look at the IPv6 table I see: IPv6 Routing Table Summary - 8625 entries 5 local, 2 connected, 3 static, 0 RIP, 8615 BGP 0 IS-IS, 0 OSPF Number of prefixes: /0: 1, /8: 1, /10: 1, /12: 1, /16: 1, /19: 2, /20: 5, /21: 3 /22: 5, /23: 5, /24: 7, /25: 4, /26: 9, /27: 10, /28: 31, /29: 19 /30: 15, /31: 13, /32: 4049, /33: 97, /34: 87, /35: 93, /36: 242, /37: 7 /38: 50, /39: 22, /40: 385, /41: 12, /42: 18, /43: 34, /44: 151, /45: 15 /46: 75, /47: 45, /48: 3006, /49: 3, /50: 1, /52: 5, /56: 9, /64: 40 /126: 1, /128: 45 So where did all the /48s come from ... also one or two /40s... ?? What do you think about this? If you're a SP would you route the /48s or /40s from the customers? What about your upstream peers? Thanks in advance for your answers. John John Collins Eidgenössisches Finanzdepartement EFD Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT Basisprodukte Telekommunikation Netzplanung und Engineering

6 5

Network & Security Engineer @upc-cablecom
by Daniel Stocker 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

hi, our team is looking for a "Network & Security Engineer". jobdescription (in german): http://www.jobwinner.ch/pages/partners/jobdetails.seam?publishing=cablecom-… feel free to contact me if you have any questions. cheers stöge

1 0

massive amount of hanging web connection
by Silvan M. Gebhardt 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

Good Evening, We currently face an excessive amount of open/closing connections on our webservers (dozends of servers showing the same thing) and it is going to all different domains and different files, looks like massive connection aborts going on. Does anyone know if a large ADSL/Cableprovider is having problems? We do not see packet drops at our Firewalls at all best, Silvan

2 1

SwiNOG #24, Agenda has been published
by Steven Glogger 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

Dear SwiNOGers, The agenda for SwiNOG #24 has now officially been published: http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog24/agenda.asp A special thank to our sponsors which helped us to make this event happen: Cisco e-shelter Level 3 Registration: https://register.swinog.ch/ Have a nice day! -steven

1 0

Swiss IPv6 Council Survey – gentle reminder, deadline this Friday
by Silvia Hagen 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

Dear list members Thanks to all the participants who have already filled out the survey and given valuable information. Those who have not done so yet, we kindly ask them to fill it out by this Friday April 27. We highly appreciate your time and answers. The more answers, the more representative of the Swiss landscape the analysis will be. Here's the survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/SR7NRTG Some of you have stated interest in presenting at our next member event on May 14 in Zurich, but forgot to leave their contact information. If this happened to you, pls contact us at info at swissipv6council.ch. Pls note, that we will treat your information strictly confidential unless we have a personal agreement with you. Thanks again for your time and we hope to see you on May 14, whether you are presenting or simply participating, we would be happy to welcome you. And also don't forget to register for the party on June 6! Here's the link: http://www.swissipv6council.ch/de/events Looking forward to seeing you Silvia Hagen

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog