-----Original Message-----
The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked did pay too much as well. =:-)
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
CU, Venty
Martin Ebnöther wrote:
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
In consideration of the BÜPF / VÜPF regulation, that's just normal, right?
BTW Computerworld had also some news regarding the case last friday: http://www.computerworld.ch/news/0503111755.html
F.
Zitat von Fredy Kuenzler kuenzler@init7.net:
"«Diese Äpfel will ich auch», sagt Swisscom-Kunde Fredy Künzler, CEO der Init7. Mit seinem Telekommunikationsunternehmen ist er auf Mietleitungen der Swisscom angewiesen. "
Are you talking about these Apples? http://adsl.bluewin.ch/images2004/German/bg_start.jpg
*SCNR*
Freundliche Grüsse
Stefan Rothenbühler Systemadministration
**************** tl.media group fon +41 41 741 1210 fax +41 41 741 1235
mail admin@tlmedia.ch web http://www.tlmedia.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Are you talking about these Apples? http://adsl.bluewin.ch/images2004/German/bg_start.jpg
Note that this is a very interesting advertizement. Perhaps the bluewin marketing didnt even notice.
Basicly it says "try first, then buy" and showing a lot is used apples. But in fact, none of the apples has been sold. Should we understand that people tried and did not want to buy them? :-PPPP
Pascal
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebnöther Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2005 09:16 An: swinog@swinog.ch Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
-----Original Message-----
The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked did pay too much as well. =:-)
Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/
Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
CU, Venty _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
Moin,
I suggest to take Xavers statement as it is. no more comments - everybody who tried hard enough got the message.
cheers pap
-----Original Message----- From: swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch] On Behalf Of Guido Roeskens Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 20:44 To: swinog@swinog.ch Subject: Re: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our newnetzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question,
but none has
to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one
comes not far...
If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways
"kopierer@...." That
becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Guido Roeskens wrote:
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
I think Xaver is talking about what Venty pointed out earlier:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
To my understanding, Xavier points out the fact that the document in question is an image file, and can thus hardly be located in inboxes by pattern searching...hence also the analogy with the needle in a haystack.
But then again...I might just be on drugs 8-)
Cheers Chris
Hi Guido,
I would be interested to hear Swisscom's take on things, insofar as you're able/allowed to comment, and I'd hope people wouldn't flame you for trying to explain your/their side.
(I can run this through babelfish a few times if it helps :-)
-John
Guido Roeskens wrote:
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
-
Chris Burri -
Fredy Kuenzler -
gmx -
Guido Roeskens -
John Morgan Salomon -
Martin Ebnöther -
Pascal Gloor -
Stefan Rothenbühler -
Xaver Aerni