I think it's far too early to jump into conclusions right now. The court didn't even state it's reasons in detail. As far as I understand it right now, this does only mean one has to take care about data that contains ip addresses - but not, that such data processing would be a legal problem at all...
Well, the court doesn't state anything in detail in a press release. It's in the court decision document. But we're off-topic I think. Lets just aggregate all open questions and I'll get answers from a qualified person, a lawyer, not techies like us ;-)
Pascal