Xaver Aerni wrote:
IP Block is the Problem, you are Blocking more sites as the to block... I think a Server has 100 Sites if you block the IP all 100 Sites are blocked. You have a big Problem you must block a Site Xy and the UBS.Com or an other bigger Firm is on the same server.
In other words, you need to publish content you don't want to be removed on a company webserver outside of switzerland, or easier, put it on twitter, digg, facebook, myspace etc etc etc... hell, make it a video message on Youtube ;)
Another trick is to get accounts on massive shared hosting servers.
Lets see a 'judge' request for blocking that kind of sites. Of course, Google Cache and archive.org is always so nice to retain a copy ;)
IP-based blocking is too crude, as it hurts other content too. DNS-based blocking is too minimal as it can be circumvented easily.
Both of course don't stand a chance against anonymizers and proxies.
As there clearly is no technical way to block the content, the only thing that is achieved is that the judge asks to censor the requested blocks from people who don't want to see it in the first place (people who want to see it will circumvent the block).
As such, request the 'judge' to provide the technical means to really make his/her request for blocking really effective and not just a little step up to get there.
Greets, Jeroen