Guido Roeskens wrote:
Hello,
Xaver Aerni wrote:
I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...
if you argue like this against us (/me now beeing Swisscom employee again;-) you will certainly loose.
Should I try to google-translate it back to german?
Regarding the issue as it is, I'll not comment at all since I don't like beeing flamed.
Guido
I think Xaver is talking about what Venty pointed out earlier:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."
To my understanding, Xavier points out the fact that the document in question is an image file, and can thus hardly be located in inboxes by pattern searching...hence also the analogy with the needle in a haystack.
But then again...I might just be on drugs 8-)
Cheers Chris