11 Dec
2008
11 Dec
'08
12:22 a.m.
On Wednesday 10. December 2008, Chris Gravell wrote:
Sounds perfectly reasonable. This is not censorship of ones¹ right to be. This is an example of criminality and the onus would be on UBS et al to negate it.
What a new way of interpreting "justice". The acused has to proove its innocence...
.oO(isn't that the general appearance of censorship and totalitarian regimes?)
No further comments...
Michi
--
George Orwell was an optimist.