100% certainty, the *lower* RTT happens on the plug #2, the
*higher* happens on the plug #1. Revdns is not very helpful in
identifying the stack here as for both I see a similar entry:
* xdsl-*.adslplus.ch for the old connection (slow)
* adsl-*.adslplus.ch for the new connection (fast)
I'm very curious about the direction of change here, given what Fredy says, that in Zurich #2 is BBCS. It would be really really surprising to discover that Swisscom BBCS is faster than EWZ. Init7's check gives me the following info about the OTO
{
"pop": "790HOT",
"fiber7": true,
"fiber_max_speed": 25000000,
"planned": {
"fiber7": null,
"xgspon": null,
"fiber7x": null
},
"veto": false,
"topologies": {
"eth": true,
"xgspon": true,
"dsl": false
}
}
but apart from the fact that I can use P2P and P2MP in my connection, it does not tell me more. Of course if someone has access to any check to confirm the backend for #1 and #2, I'm happy to provide the OTO ID.
Cheers!
You sure that the change didn‘t happen from plug 2 to 1?! Plug 2 is (mostly) using Swisscom‘s BBCS infrastructure, while plug 1 belongs to ewz and is used by other service providers (Disclaimer #1: this applies only to Zurich, other locations may differ; Disclaimer #2: Init7 is using both plug 1 and 2 in Zurich for Fiber7, but not BBCS). The latency drop could explain if your connection is no longer on BBCS, as it usually adds about 5 to 10ms. -- Fredy Künzler Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd. Technoparkstrasse 5 CH-8406 Winterthur https://www.init7.net/Am 29.11.2022 um 12:49 schrieb Fabian Wenk via swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch>: Hello MatOn 29.11.2022 10:41, Mat Kowalski via swinog wrote: For interested, here are 3 graphs presenting the drop. For every graph the left side is OTO#1 and the right is OTO#2. Monday morning was the time of changing the line: 1) https://i.ibb.co/qRL1Hyb/1.png <https://i.ibb.co/qRL1Hyb/1.png>I do have a connection on OTO Plug 1 in Zürich, even with the EWZ provided Fiber/Ethernet bridge (4 Ethernet-Ports), with one port used for a line to Cyberlink (1 Gbit/s). External physical systems within Switzerland are mostly 2 - 2.5 ms with IPv4, IPv6 sometimes slightly more. The DNS at 8.8.8.8 / 2001:4860:4860::8888 has 1.8 ms. And the VM I have at ungleich.ch, has 4.7 ms (IPv4), and 5.2 ms (IPv6). Almost a decade ago I had a MC2-based (copper) line with 10 Mbit/s from Cyberlink and I do remember that for systems within Switzerland it was also at ~3 ms. I also have a Sunrise/UPC Cable connection with IPv4 only, there the latency is ~21.5 ms and 25.4 ms (for the VM). But during the night (since around end of August) it is significantly higher, sometimes even above 50 ms. This is not the first time and it usually does improve again after a few month, e.g. when they split the cable segment into smaller areas. So for me it seems that your ISP probably has the most influence for the latency of your line with their infrastructure and transit behind. Best regards, Fabian _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-leave@lists.swinog.ch_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-leave@lists.swinog.ch
-- Mat Kowalski (He / Him / His) Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat Switzerland PGP: 0x759E193F489DC659 My working hours may not be your working hours. Please don't feel obligated to respond outside of your normal schedule.