well, that is not even required - only a lookalike with some "Zöpfen" could be sufficient 


Am 15.01.2009 um 20:34 schrieb roger@mgz.ch:


maybe some hacker getting hired to locate a child-porn pic on the first page of some
unwanted politician. that would be then a reason for filtering this page.

slowly the internet starts to get unusable ... and be the playground of some organisation
and government.

Roger


I know that it is futile. there it's about the "Prinzip" - I hate to have to use some anonymizer to use
archive.org (where I did download some stuff in the past years, as they don't only host "websites"
In this regard, I still trust my ISP not to put one of these boxes in use any time....
I mean, there is not only "child p..." anymore, we begin to see the collateral damage, on wikipedia
or now this try, I remember reading about germany asking to block online gambling sites next -
what comes next?? Perhabs the hacker tool sites get blocked in germany?
silvan
Am 15.01.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Jeroen Massar:

   Silvan Gebhardt wrote:
   Hi
   I just read about the blocking of archive.org (which is for me an
   ususal site(!)
   ( http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Britische-Jugendschuetzer-lassen-Internet-Archiv-
   blockieren--/meldung/121754
   ) is one source, which refers to
   http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/
   Do We have to expect that the ISP using the white clean box do block
   archive.org soon (and as the article states, probably completely?)

   Guess Google Cache will be next th




_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog