1.) Check with https://www.ict-plus.ch
They have a lot experiences with Long reach wifi... 
2.) why not just a standard USV? Solar or Wind buffered... or is a normal power supply only sometimes available?

Fründlechi Grüess 
Martin Fischer 


Am 09.08.2018 um 11:08 schrieb swinog-request@lists.swinog.ch:

Send swinog mailing list submissions to
   swinog@lists.swinog.ch

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   swinog-request@lists.swinog.ch

You can reach the person managing the list at
   swinog-owner@lists.swinog.ch

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of swinog digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Nico Schottelius)
  2. Re: Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Andreas Fink)
  3. Re: Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop) (Matthias Cramer)
  4. Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Benoit Panizzon)
  5. Re: Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Florian Bruhin)
  6. Re: Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors? (Benoit Panizzon)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:43:54 +0200
From: Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@ungleich.ch>
To: swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch>
Subject: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop)
Message-ID: <87bmadj7mt.fsf@line.ungleich.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain


Hey Swinog,

does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered
by battery?

With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to
Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours.

The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power
resource.

So my questions to the list are:

- What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you recommend?
- Are there any battery recommendations?
- Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s
 connectivity?

Best,

Nico




--
Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on www.datacenterlight.ch.



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 15:58:41 +0200
From: Andreas Fink <afink@list.fink.org>
To: Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@ungleich.ch>
Cc: swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch>
Subject: Re: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop)
Message-ID: <1593479F-DF99-4D13-BA96-2D14E7E29136@list.fink.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii



On 8 Aug 2018, at 15:43, Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@ungleich.ch> wrote:


Hey Swinog,

does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered
by battery?

With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to
Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours.

The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power
resource.

So my questions to the list are:

- What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you recommend?
- Are there any battery recommendations?
- Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s
connectivity?



Given big enough dishes and line of sight, this is achieveable. We had 40km links in rural areas of Iceland working. Its all a question of terrain, interfearance and right equipment.
As far as power goes, a solar system can help to keep it operational.

Best,

Nico




--
Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on www.datacenterlight.ch.


_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 16:33:52 +0200
From: Matthias Cramer <matthias.cramer@iway.ch>
To: <swinog@lists.swinog.ch>
Subject: Re: [swinog] Battery powered wifi link (20km, multihop)
Message-ID: <d9b86b8c-af79-219a-0b19-867e78854be5@iway.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hoi Nico

Mit einem P?rchen Antennen wie diesen an jedem Hop ist das sicher machbar.

https://mikrotik.com/product/RBLHG-5HPnD

Als Baterien kannst du z.B. 100AH Autobateriene einsetzen, damit bekommst du ?ber 70h Betriebsdauer mit zwei Antennen...

Du musst jedoch daf?r sorgen das du zwischen den Antennen freie Sicht hast, sonst wird das nicht wirklich funktionieren.

Wir haben vor vielen Jahren mal einen WiFi Link zwischen Otelfingen und Regensdorf ohne zwischenhop gemacht (~8km), das hat
mehrere Jahr stabil funktioniert. War jedoch anderes Equipment.

Gruss Matthias


On 08/08/18 15:43, Nico Schottelius wrote:

Hey Swinog,

does anyone have experiences with long distance (~20km) wifi powered
by battery?

With have the situation that we basically want to connect Schwanden to
Linthal by wifi for at least 12 hours.

The idea is to go via several hops, some of them not having any power
resource.

So my questions to the list are:

- What kind of equipment have you used for similar cases or can you recommend?
- Are there any battery recommendations?
- Other creative ideas on how to get a direct link with >= 100 Mbit/s
 connectivity?

Best,

Nico




--
Your Swiss, Open Source and IPv6 Virtual Machine. Now on www.datacenterlight.ch.


_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



--
Matthias Cramer / mc322-ripe   Senior Network & Security Engineer
iway AG                        Phone +41 43 500 1111 <sip:0435001111>
Badenerstrasse 569             Fax   +41 44 271 3535 <sip:0442713535>
CH-8048 Z?rich                 http://www.iway.ch/
GnuPG 1024D/2D208250 = DBC6 65B6 7083 1029 781E  3959 B62F DF1C 2D20 8250



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:50:18 +0200
From: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch>
To: swinog@swinog.ch
Subject: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors?
Message-ID: <20180809105018.481bbbe3@go.imp.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Community

Anyone else experiencing high latency and packetloss towards

ch.archive.ubuntu.com / mirror.switch.ch

IPv4 via SwissIX.
IPv6 via HE.

--- frisal.switch.ch ping statistics ---
99 packets transmitted, 34 received, 65% packet loss, time 99279ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 425.674/601.445/705.015/62.817 ms

--- ch.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics ---
21 packets transmitted, 7 received, 66% packet loss, time 20262ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 531.911/594.194/645.790/43.318 ms

Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen

-Beno?t Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e   A G    -    Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29             Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln                Fax  +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz                         Web  http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:03:11 +0200
From: Florian Bruhin <me@the-compiler.org>
To: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch>
Cc: swinog@swinog.ch
Subject: Re: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors?
Message-ID: <20180809090311.6lozw7uptirpmqk2@hooch.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:50:18AM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
Anyone else experiencing high latency and packetloss towards

ch.archive.ubuntu.com / mirror.switch.ch

Switch seems to be having trouble:
https://www.switch.ch/network/operations/trouble-tickets/?action=show&id=1399

Florian

--
https://www.qutebrowser.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
  GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
        I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.swinog.ch/public/swinog/attachments/20180809/403c4000/attachment-0001.pgp>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:08:44 +0200
From: Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch>
To: swinog@swinog.ch
Subject: Re: [swinog] Huge Packetloss towards switch mirrors?
Message-ID: <20180809110844.206de3cf@go.imp.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:59:47 +0200
schrieb Claudio Kuenzler <ck@claudiokuenzler.com>:

Update: Switch just changed something in their routing.
No packet loss anymore from both source networks.

PING ch.archive.ubuntu.com(frisal.switch.ch (2001:620:0:1002::20)) 56 data bytes
^C
--- ch.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 13293ms

Here it's worse for IPv6 :-)
IPv4 indeed is fine now.

https://www.woody.ch/cgi-bin/smokeping.cgi?filter=switch;target=World.Europe.Switzerland.Networks.Switch

Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen

-Beno?t Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e   A G    -    Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29             Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln                Fax  +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz                         Web  http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


End of swinog Digest, Vol 163, Issue 2
**************************************