nearly same story as sdsl before,
VTX used 2 IP out of the customer /29 range  for the wan link.
Traceroute looked funny, not to mention how that "improved" icmp Trouble

Cheers ...



Am 8 Jun 2007 um 1:09 hat Daniel Roethlisberger geschrieben:

Date sent:                  Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:09:56 +0200
From:                         Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel@roe.ch>
To:                             swinog@swinog.ch
Subject:                      Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
Send reply to:             swinog@swinog.ch
                                  <mailto:swinog- request@lists.swinog.ch?subject=unsubscribe>
                                  <mailto:swinog- request@lists.swinog.ch?subject=subscribe>

> Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor@spale.com> 2007-06-07:
> [snip]
> > This is the normal routed case. I think this is what Daniel was
> > looking for.
>
> Not quite, but oh never mind.  The point I was trying to make is the
> fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be
> able to assign *any* address of his /30 subnet to a server behind his
> ADSL router because all of the subnet would be consumed by the link from
> the LNS to the ADSL router (I guess this hasn't come across too well
> from my message).
>
> It seems nobody can imagine how this is supposed to be the case, so I
> guess that confirms that it's probably bogus information.  Thanks anyway
> for all responses!
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> --
> Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel@roe.ch>
> _______________________________________________
> swinog mailing list
> swinog@lists.swinog.ch
> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 
graphic
csdata brasil Ltda.
Roger Schmid
Rua Arquiteto Luiz Nunes 186
Imbiribeira
CEP: 51170-430            
Recife / PE
BR     +55 81 3422 1714
US:      +1 360 515 33 80
CH:    +41 32 5110858
UK:    +44 8444845331
VOIP: 3011@sip.ip-tel.ch